You are here

thinktime

Linux Australia News: Linux Australia 2016 AGM Minutes

Planet Linux Australia - Sat 07th Jan 2017 13:01

Minutes of Linux Australia
Annual General Meeting 2016

Deakin University, Waterfront Campus, Geelong, Victoria
Monday 1st February 2016, Room D2.193 Percy Baxter Theatre

Minutes taken by Ms Sae Ra GERMAINE, Ms Kathy REID.
Collated by Ms Katie McLAUGHLIN

The meeting was opened at 1802 by Mr JOSH HESKETH

Mr HESKETH noted that it was his last AGM as president

MOTION by Mr HESKETH That the minutes of the 2015 AGM are accepted https://linux.org.au/meeting/2015-01-12
SECONDED by Mr STEWART SMITH
CARRIED with 1 abstention

Officers Reports

President’s Report (Appendix A)

The President’s report was presented by Mr HESKETH

No comments from members were made on the President’s report
Members thanked the Council members in doing the due diligence
Members thanked the admin team, for auditing

Mr HESKETH noted the following:
Subcommittee Policy
Overseeing the events has been a challenge
The LCA Ghosts allows for the continuation of knowledge
A review of the policy should be undertaken in future years

Advocacy, outreach
LA’s ability to address this relies on member submissions
Submission was made in the previous year of the TPP, software patents and intellectual property.
The Council has an outstanding action item to make contacts to various people that may have some information and legal advice on what we can do.

Membership Platform
state has not changed we have a document that shows what we require
The strategy is to rewrite or look for an alternative solution seeking input from volunteers

Challenges
the need for a name change. “Linux Australia” is no longer accurate, very little of our work is focussed on Linux itself.

Closing Comments
This is the last term for Mr Josh HESKETH
Mr Josh HESKETH comments that it has been a pleasure and an honour

Questions from the Floor
Mr Craige McWHIRTER comments that GovHack 2016 was not listed as an event

Mr HESKETH replied that there is not a formed subcommittee for GovHack 2016 at this time. They are working on a new policy which will better suit their needs. Council to work through this. Expect it to be a subcommittee.

Mr Peter CHUBB asks what is happening with older subcommittees

Mr HESKETH replies that there are two types of subcommittees: Events Subcommittees and Other Subcommittees. Some subcommittees are such as LUGs and Meetups are formed under the old policy, but newer events are covered under the newer subcommittee policy. Without enthusiastic volunteers, we won't establish a new committee.

MOTION raised by Mr Mike CARDEN to accept President’s report
SECONDED by Mr Christopher NEUGEBAUER
CARRIED with one abstention

Inflection Point

Ms Kathy REID initiated the conversation of Inflection Point
Refer to http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/linux-aus/2016-January/022356.html

Ms REID strongly urged the 2016 Council to consider the document

Treasurer’s Report

Presented by Mr Tony BREEDS (via teleconference)

Mr BREEDS apologises for the late delivery of the report, and thanked the 2014 Council for leaving the budget in such a good shape; even though there was an income loss due to LCA2014 not performing quite as expected.

Mr BREEDS notes the financial year for the report is from October 1 to September 30
Mr BREEDS reports a high profit of $143,000 over the last financial year.
Mr BREEDS notes that the profit was due to the success of the LCA2015, DrupalSouth and PyConAU conferences, and thanks those event organisers.

Mr BREEDS notes a small loss from the WordCamp Sydney event, due to one of their sponsorships from WordPress. Linux Australia is working closely with the WordPress Foundation.

Mr BREEDS notes that the suggested improvements from the 2014 Council Treasurer Mr Francois MARIER have all been actioned.

Mr BREEDS notes that of the $5,000 set aside for grants, only half of this was used. This is due to the way grants are counted. The grant for Drupal 8, for example, was handed out of profits of conferences, and appear as Sponsorships rather than Grants

Mr BREEDS notes that the insurance costs for the year were over budget, due to the GovHack event.

Mr BREEDS notes a signed 3 year contract for server maintenance

Mr BREEDS notes that the 2016 budget has not been formally moved to Council. Mr BREEDS suggested that LA increase budget for sponsorship to support organisations such as SFC, EFA and Drupal Foundation.

Mr BREEDS thanks all past Treasurers for their hard work and efforts, specifically Mr RUSSELL STUART and Mr PETER LIEVERDINK

Questions from the Floor

Mr HESKETH notes a profit of $22-23K. The way the financial stuff worked and WordPress Foundation. When it was resolved, we needed to cancel the invoice we had for WordPress. We do not use the overall profit as success.

MOTION by Mr STEVEN ELLIS to accept the Treasurer’s Report
SECONDED by Mr PAUL WAYPER
CARRIED with 1 abstention

Auditor’s Report (Appendix C)

Presented by Mr HESKETH on behalf of the Auditor

Mr HESKETH reported that a Financial Audit has been conducted. The entire report, and all notes, are available online

Questions from the floor

Mr Julian GOODWIN asks whether the holding of large amounts of cash reserves is appropriate

Mr HESKETH replies with an outline of how LA holds cash equivalents and manages cashflow to optimise revenue.

Ms REID asks if the auditor’s report was qualified or unqualified

Mr HESKETH replies that it was an unqualified report

MOTION by Mr Andrew DONELLAN to receive the Auditor’s Report
SECONDED by Mr Tim SERONG
CARRIED unanimously

Secretary's Report (Appendix D)

Presented by Ms GERMAINE

Questions from the floor

Ms Lin NAH asked a question between the difference between financial and non financial membership

Ms GERMAINE notes that there is no difference. Ms GERMAINE also notes that donations can be accepted, but not as a financial member. Also noted is that this has been considered in the past but was decided as not something the Council wanted to pursue at the time.

MOTION by Mr Cameron TUDBALL to accept the Secretary’s Report
SECONDED by Mr Matthew CENGIA
CARRIED unanimously.

Motions

MOTION by Ms REID that the membership approves of the actions of Council
SECONDED by Mr Peter (Surname Missed)
CARRIED with 5 abstentions

MOTION by Ms REID that the Linux Australia community extend their sincere thanks to Mr JOSHUA HESKETH for his exemplary, tireless and sustained efforts as President, Treasurer and Council Member of Linux Australia for the last six years. His affable nature, diplomatic approach, diligence and forethought have served the organisation invaluably.
SECONDED by Mr Mike CARDEN
CARRIED with 1 abstention by Mr HESKETH

MOTION by Ms REID that the Linux Australia community extend their sincere thanks to the Council for 2015: Vice President Mr JOSH STEWART, Secretary Ms GERMAINE, Treasurer Mr BREEDS, Council Members Mr JAMES ISEPPI, Mr McWHIRTER, Mr NEUGEBAUER
SECONDED by Ms McLAUGHLIN
CARRIED with 4 abstentions

General Questions from the Floor

Mr ELLIS enquired about the potential for a partnership with the NZOpen Source Society. Trying to get a lot more events in motion, wanting to strengthen partnerships with Linux Australia

MOTION by Ms REID to that the community in general support the closer working together of the NZ Open Source Society and Linux Australia
SECONDED by Mr ELLIS
CARRIED unanimously.

Ms DONNA BENJAMIN highlighted the lack of awareness of the Drupal Community. Ms BENJAMIN notes that she is aware that the Drupal Association wants to own the Drupal Events in Australia

Mr HESKETH replies that council have been working with the Drupal Community over the last few months to strengthen the relationship. Acknowledged some miscommunication has occurred with WordPress Foundation and the way that sponsorship occurs. Need to work closely to reduce administrative overhead, and to align goals and interests. Both organisations want to run good open source events.

Ms BENJAMIN asks if there was an expectation that the profits from WordCamp would be returned to the WordPress Foundation

Mr HESKETH replied that No, and the Council would ensure clarity in the future.

Mr Tim (Surname Missed), Lead of WordPress Brisbane, noted that is was their understanding that the financial issues had been resolved, and the WordPress Foundation is grateful for the services that LA provides, and express their gratitude. WordPress community in Australia is willing to work with the Drupal communities and LA to strengthen all communities.

Election of 2016 Council

Mr STEWART SMITH acting as Returning Officer

Mr SMITH notes that the election is run on software he wrote.

Full results https://linux.org.au/membership/index.php?page=view-election&id=22

Election Results:
President: Mr HUGH BLEMINGS.
Vice President: Ms KATHY REID
Secretary: Ms SAE RA GERMAINE
Treasurer: Mr Tony BREEDS
Council Members: Ms CHERIE ELLIS, Ms KATIE McLAUGHLIN, Mr CRAIGE McWHIRTER

Of note: the Election Software recorded an identical amount of votes for Mr McWHIRTER and Mr JAMES ISEPPI. Due to the nature of the program, a ‘coin flip’ of unknown randomisation was used to present either candidate on the page, changing when the page is refreshed.

The Tie Break used was a Physical Coin Flip during the AGM. This was won by Mr McWHIRTER

It was Noted that this Council represents the highest number of women to ever serve on a Council, and are in the majority for the Council

Mr SMITH thanked those who voted, the outgoing council, and the incoming council.

Mr HESKETH gave a warm welcome to the incoming council

Questions from the floor for the new council

Mr HESKETH notes that the votes in the 2015 election numbered 70, whereas this election, 2016, numbered 112. This is a significant increase.

Mr TENNESSEE LEEUWENBURG asked a question regarding active discussion, new names, directions and strategies

Mr BLEMINGS replied that this was something we need to engage with the council and the broader community.

Address from the Incoming President

Mr BLEMINGS noted he was grateful to serve the community in his new position.

Mr BLEMINGS thanked Mr SMITH as the returning officer

Mr BLEMINGS noted the issue of addressing the membership database, with tooling being but one of the interesting challenges ahead.

Mr BLEMINGS noted the expectation as the council to rely on the community

Mr BLEMINGS opened the floor to further questions

Mr RUSSELL COKER noted a LUV free BBQ

Ms CHERIE ELLIS noted communications with NZOpen Source will be improved

MR JOSH HESKETH officially closing the meeting at 1916 hours

Appendix A: President’s Report
Executive summary

Linux Australia continues to be the peak body for Open Source communities in Australia with a strong year. 2015 saw seven open source conferences run within Australia and New Zealand by volunteers under the auspices of LA. This sustained strength in local events is a testament to the dedication and hard work of our collective and expanding community.

During the year the organisation had to deal with an unfortunate breach of their servers. Thankfully the damage was limited and no personal data is believed to be compromised[0]. Full details were released to the members as soon as it was practical and the overall handling and disclosure of the incident was widely praised. A second potential leak of information later in the year highlighted the need for more volunteer help and efforts in keeping our systems up to date and our data secure[1].

After the financial loss from the previous year, the organisation has managed to return a healthy profit and strengthen its overall position allowing itself to be self insuring against conference losses. This is thanks to the hard work of all the events and volunteers throughout the year.

While a 2016 budget is still being drafted it is the hope of the outgoing council that some of the extra funds will be put into the grants and sponsorship account allowing the organisation to create stronger roots in allied organisations such as the Software Freedom Conservancy and the Electronics Frontiers Australia.

The organisation is at a bit of a crossroads while it looks towards the future. I believe protecting our values[2] in an online-first world will become increasingly important. Software as a service poses significant challenges to open source, open data and privacy. I hope to spend a bit of time thinking about ways in which we can address some of these challenges both as Linux Australia and as an open community.

Kathy Reid kicked off a great inflection point on Linux Australia’s strategic direction, proposing some challenges, options and solutions[3]. Anthony Towns also weighed in with some very pragmatic thoughts that were well received by the members[4]. These discussions are ongoing and anybody interested in weighing in (or even better, volunteering) is encouraged to do so on the linux-aus[5] mailing list (which also contains the relevant archives).

As many are likely aware, I decided early on in the year that this term would be my last. I have been on the council for 6 years now (and involved with LA for even longer) and I think it's time for some fresh blood, so to speak. I can not give enough thanks to all of the members and fellow councilors for their support and hard work during this time. I look forward to welcoming in the new council and wish them all the best.

Events and Conferences

During 2015 there were 7 conferences/events ran as part of Linux Australia.

LCA2015
DrupalSouth 2015
PyConAU 2015
OSDC 2015
GovHack 2015
JoomlaDay Brisbane 2015
WordCamp Brisbane 2015

The upcoming events currently being organised as part of Linux Australia:
LCA2016
PyCon AU 2016
WordCamp Sunshine Coast 2016
DrupalSouth 2016
DrupalGov 2016
LCA2017
LCA2018

Reports from the various conferences and their activities can be found at http://linux.org.au/sub-committees or their individual websites.

A timeline of all of Linux Australia’s events can be found here: http://tinyurl.com/koye3mw.

Grants and Sponsorships

Linux Australia has long had a grants programme[6] open to its members for helping fund items that are in alignment with our values[2]. This year the Council approved 2 requests from members and sponsored 3 initiatives.

Contributions to the Drupal8 Acceler8 fund to the value of $7,500
Grant Request from Andrew Donnellan to fund Russell Keith-Magee as a presenter at CompCon 2015 to the value of $1,200.
GovHack award “Open source bounty” for $2,000
Grant request from Donna Benjamin to the value of $1,000 to support the release party for Drupal 8.
DrupalCamp Silver Sponsorship to the value of $500

Sub-Committees

The current non-conference based sub-committees are:

Admin Team
AV Subcommittee
Mirror Team
Web Team
Sydney Linux Users Group
LOGIN (NewcastleLUG)
TASLUG
Media and Communications Subcommittee

Reports from the various sub-committees and their activities can be found at http://linux.org.au/sub-committees

Subcommittee policy and procedure updates

During 2014 the council spent a considerable amount of time working on a new subcommittee policy to help with oversight and the longevity of Linux Australia’s various events. The policy has proven to be a success and has ensured that our conferences have the appropriate help and responsibility assigned to them.

While the policy has been very effective in the early stages of a new subcommittee (during the formation and early budgeting) adherence to it has tended to dwindle as events get closer to their dates. One challenge is finding effective community members to help sit on the various subcommittees. Another is clearly the larger amount of bureaucracy that the policy adds.

The 2016 council should pay close attention to this to ensure that events do not become complacent. A review of the policy would also be helpful given the extra data after having used it for over a year to make sure the policy is actually practicable and actionable.

Advocacy, outreach and related activities

Through our Twitter account, we highlighted articles of interest to the Australian Linux community and grew our number of followers.

Outreach relies on our members taking doing a lot of the leg work. We would like to encourage those interested to take initiative and reach out to the council for support.

Membership platform

One of our carry-over goals from 2014 we hoped to achieve this year was to update our membership platform (currently memberdb). Unfortunately other priorities and difficulties in infrastructure prevented significant effort being expended on this item.

The current membership platform is frail and in need of updating. We need ways to better manage importing of members from LCA registrations, and better ways of contacting our members who may not be on the mailing lists.

The Council, thanks to the hard work of Kathy Reid, has put together a list of requirements of a membership platform and will be looking for volunteers to help with shifting to a new system.

Additionally the Council has considered ways to keep the membership list relevant with only active participants. This is a continued discussion that is dependent on a new system to improve communication before any action can be taken.

Challenges

Linux Australia has a lot of challenges ahead of itself for the coming few years.

I would like to see the community thinking about some bigger questions. The organisation has been successful in recent years in running events but less so in lobbying to the government or advocating for policy changes etc.

Linux and open source are generally well received technologies and don’t require advocating for in the same way that they may have been 10-15 years ago. This raises a question of how do we stay relevant as Linux Australia. In fact, it is pretty obvious that we aren’t relevant as "Linux" Australia since we’re much more about being an open source organisation.

A name change for our organisation has been discussed many times before, but I believe it to still be an important discussion. However, extending even further from that are more fundamental questions to the organisation. For example, with open source being so mainstream, what does that mean for us? Or what does the popularity of mobile and web platforms mean for open source? Are there opportunities or a need for advocacy in those areas? How do we extend our ideals to open web, open data, open government, open hardware and open culture? How do we ensure that our values[2] are upheld in our industries?

I would like to encourage and challenge our membership to be discussing these types of issues in a large picture sense and to be giving thought as to how we might be able to address some of them. Clearly these types of questions are very difficult to tackle purely at a Council level - especially when they are concerned with the administration and ongoing running of the organisation - so it is imperative that the community attempts to gain a consolidated voice in these areas.

A lot of these challenges are reflected in the 2013 membership survey[7] where our brand and purpose was often mis-identified by members not understanding what we do. Addressing these systemic questions will help guide the direction of the organisation and also lead towards addressing issues such as our poor communication to membership.

Closing comments

It has been an honour to be trusted by the community to lead this organisation for such a long time. While I haven't achieved as much as I had planned, it has been a privilege to be involved and to do what I could. I hope that I have been able to improve and continue the organisation's success during this time. Thank you all for this opportunity.

While I have left a large number of proposed, and deliberately unanswered, questions in this report, I hope our members are not discouraged. I believe that we’ve had a very successful year and from an everyday running standpoint we continue to be functional and productive.

However I also believe we will find ourselves at a crossroads where, without these questions addressed, over the next year or two we will fail to keep relevant and we risk becoming complacent and existing purely to do no more than running conferences.

Perhaps that isn’t a bad thing, but it really comes down to our community and members. The Council is not here to drive the organisation but to merely enable its members. As such the direction and outcomes of the organisation will be defined by what we can do collectively, and not by what the Council tries to do.

Of course with the emphasis on the members I can not state highly enough just how much work volunteers put into the organisation. I wish I could thank them all, but I don’t think it is possible. Needless to say it is through the continued hard work of these individuals that Linux Australia continues to operate, and as such, I wish to say thank you to everybody who has been involved.

Similarly with myself not being on the 2016 council, that doesn't mean I will be disappearing altogether. I intend to help the new council on these challenges in any way I can. I also want to make sure that I'm available to consult and offer advice where possible should the new council wish to reach out.

Thank you all for a wonderful term. I look forward to watching this organisation continue to grow to its full potential.

Warm Regards,
Joshua Hesketh
- President, Linux Australia
January, 2016

[0] http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/announce/2015-April/000202.html
[1] http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/announce/2015-November/000213.html
[2] http://linux.org.au/values
[3] http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/linux-aus/2016-January/022356.html
[4] http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/linux-aus/2016-January/022419.html
[5] http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus
[6] http://linux.org.au/projects/grants
[7] https://linux.org.au/news/news/linux-australia-member-survey-2013

Appendix B: Treasurer’s Report
http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/announce/2016-February/000220.html

Appendix C: Secretary’s Report
http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/linux-aus/attachments/20160129/cbf20cd4/attachment-0001.pdf

Appendix D: Auditor’s Report
http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/announce/attachments/20160201/1820f1ac/attachment-0005.pdf

Appendix E: Record of Attendance

Andrew Donnellan
Andrew McDonnell
Andrew Pollock
Andrew Sands
Andrew Spiers
Andrew Tridgell
Andrew Van Slageren
Angus Cameron
Anthony Towns
Benjamin Ball
Brendan O'dea
Brett James
Brian May
Cameron Tudball
Cherie Ellis
Christopher Neugebauer
Clinton Roy
Craige McWhirter
David Bell
David Tulloh
Dion Hulse
Donna Benjamin
Eloise Macdonald-Meyer
Jack Burton
James Iseppi
James Polley
Jamie Wilkinson
Jared Ring
Jessica Smith
Joel Addison
Joel Shea
John Dalton
John Kristensen
Jonathan Woithe
Jono Bacon
Josh Stewart
Joshua Hesketh
Julian DeMarchi
Julien Goodwin
Kathy Reid
Katie McLaughlin
Leon Wright
Les Kitchen
Lin Nah
Luke Hovington
Michael Cordover
Marco Ostini
Mark Atwood
Mark Ellem
Mark Purcell
Mark Walkom
Matt Cengia
Matthew Franklin
Matthew Oliver
Michael Carden
Michael Ellery
Mike Abrahall
Miles Goodhew
Neill Cox
Paul Del
Paul Fenwick
Paul Foxworthy
Paul Wayper
Peter Chubb
Richard Lemon
Rob Bolin
Russell Coker
Russell Stuart
Ryan Sickle
Ryan Stuart
Sachi King
Stephen Walsh
Steven Ellis
Steven Hanley
Stewart Smith
Tim Ansell
Tim Serong

Categories: thinktime

Linux Australia News: Linux Australia 2016 AGM Minutes

Planet Linux Australia - Sat 07th Jan 2017 13:01

Minutes of Linux Australia
Annual General Meeting 2016

Deakin University, Waterfront Campus, Geelong, Victoria
Monday 1st February 2016, Room D2.193 Percy Baxter Theatre

Minutes taken by Ms Sae Ra GERMAINE, Ms Kathy REID.
Collated by Ms Katie McLAUGHLIN

The meeting was opened at 1802 by Mr JOSH HESKETH

Mr HESKETH noted that it was his last AGM as president

MOTION by Mr HESKETH That the minutes of the 2015 AGM are accepted https://linux.org.au/meeting/2015-01-12
SECONDED by Mr STEWART SMITH
CARRIED with 1 abstention

Officers Reports

President’s Report (Appendix A)

The President’s report was presented by Mr HESKETH

No comments from members were made on the President’s report
Members thanked the Council members in doing the due diligence
Members thanked the admin team, for auditing

Mr HESKETH noted the following:
Subcommittee Policy
Overseeing the events has been a challenge
The LCA Ghosts allows for the continuation of knowledge
A review of the policy should be undertaken in future years

Advocacy, outreach
LA’s ability to address this relies on member submissions
Submission was made in the previous year of the TPP, software patents and intellectual property.
The Council has an outstanding action item to make contacts to various people that may have some information and legal advice on what we can do.

Membership Platform
state has not changed we have a document that shows what we require
The strategy is to rewrite or look for an alternative solution seeking input from volunteers

Challenges
the need for a name change. “Linux Australia” is no longer accurate, very little of our work is focussed on Linux itself.

Closing Comments
This is the last term for Mr Josh HESKETH
Mr Josh HESKETH comments that it has been a pleasure and an honour

Questions from the Floor
Mr Craige McWHIRTER comments that GovHack 2016 was not listed as an event

Mr HESKETH replied that there is not a formed subcommittee for GovHack 2016 at this time. They are working on a new policy which will better suit their needs. Council to work through this. Expect it to be a subcommittee.

Mr Peter CHUBB asks what is happening with older subcommittees

Mr HESKETH replies that there are two types of subcommittees: Events Subcommittees and Other Subcommittees. Some subcommittees are such as LUGs and Meetups are formed under the old policy, but newer events are covered under the newer subcommittee policy. Without enthusiastic volunteers, we won't establish a new committee.

MOTION raised by Mr Mike CARDEN to accept President’s report
SECONDED by Mr Christopher NEUGEBAUER
CARRIED with one abstention

Inflection Point

Ms Kathy REID initiated the conversation of Inflection Point
Refer to http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/linux-aus/2016-January/022356.html

Ms REID strongly urged the 2016 Council to consider the document

Treasurer’s Report

Presented by Mr Tony BREEDS (via teleconference)

Mr BREEDS apologises for the late delivery of the report, and thanked the 2014 Council for leaving the budget in such a good shape; even though there was an income loss due to LCA2014 not performing quite as expected.

Mr BREEDS notes the financial year for the report is from October 1 to September 30
Mr BREEDS reports a high profit of $143,000 over the last financial year.
Mr BREEDS notes that the profit was due to the success of the LCA2015, DrupalSouth and PyConAU conferences, and thanks those event organisers.

Mr BREEDS notes a small loss from the WordCamp Sydney event, due to one of their sponsorships from WordPress. Linux Australia is working closely with the WordPress Foundation.

Mr BREEDS notes that the suggested improvements from the 2014 Council Treasurer Mr Francois MARIER have all been actioned.

Mr BREEDS notes that of the $5,000 set aside for grants, only half of this was used. This is due to the way grants are counted. The grant for Drupal 8, for example, was handed out of profits of conferences, and appear as Sponsorships rather than Grants

Mr BREEDS notes that the insurance costs for the year were over budget, due to the GovHack event.

Mr BREEDS notes a signed 3 year contract for server maintenance

Mr BREEDS notes that the 2016 budget has not been formally moved to Council. Mr BREEDS suggested that LA increase budget for sponsorship to support organisations such as SFC, EFA and Drupal Foundation.

Mr BREEDS thanks all past Treasurers for their hard work and efforts, specifically Mr RUSSELL STUART and Mr PETER LIEVERDINK

Questions from the Floor

Mr HESKETH notes a profit of $22-23K. The way the financial stuff worked and WordPress Foundation. When it was resolved, we needed to cancel the invoice we had for WordPress. We do not use the overall profit as success.

MOTION by Mr STEVEN ELLIS to accept the Treasurer’s Report
SECONDED by Mr PAUL WAYPER
CARRIED with 1 abstention

Auditor’s Report (Appendix C)

Presented by Mr HESKETH on behalf of the Auditor

Mr HESKETH reported that a Financial Audit has been conducted. The entire report, and all notes, are available online

Questions from the floor

Mr Julian GOODWIN asks whether the holding of large amounts of cash reserves is appropriate

Mr HESKETH replies with an outline of how LA holds cash equivalents and manages cashflow to optimise revenue.

Ms REID asks if the auditor’s report was qualified or unqualified

Mr HESKETH replies that it was an unqualified report

MOTION by Mr Andrew DONELLAN to receive the Auditor’s Report
SECONDED by Mr Tim SERONG
CARRIED unanimously

Secretary's Report (Appendix D)

Presented by Ms GERMAINE

Questions from the floor

Ms Lin NAH asked a question between the difference between financial and non financial membership

Ms GERMAINE notes that there is no difference. Ms GERMAINE also notes that donations can be accepted, but not as a financial member. Also noted is that this has been considered in the past but was decided as not something the Council wanted to pursue at the time.

MOTION by Mr Cameron TUDBALL to accept the Secretary’s Report
SECONDED by Mr Matthew CENGIA
CARRIED unanimously.

Motions

MOTION by Ms REID that the membership approves of the actions of Council
SECONDED by Mr Peter (Surname Missed)
CARRIED with 5 abstentions

MOTION by Ms REID that the Linux Australia community extend their sincere thanks to Mr JOSHUA HESKETH for his exemplary, tireless and sustained efforts as President, Treasurer and Council Member of Linux Australia for the last six years. His affable nature, diplomatic approach, diligence and forethought have served the organisation invaluably.
SECONDED by Mr Mike CARDEN
CARRIED with 1 abstention by Mr HESKETH

MOTION by Ms REID that the Linux Australia community extend their sincere thanks to the Council for 2015: Vice President Mr JOSH STEWART, Secretary Ms GERMAINE, Treasurer Mr BREEDS, Council Members Mr JAMES ISEPPI, Mr McWHIRTER, Mr NEUGEBAUER
SECONDED by Ms McLAUGHLIN
CARRIED with 4 abstentions

General Questions from the Floor

Mr ELLIS enquired about the potential for a partnership with the NZOpen Source Society. Trying to get a lot more events in motion, wanting to strengthen partnerships with Linux Australia

MOTION by Ms REID to that the community in general support the closer working together of the NZ Open Source Society and Linux Australia
SECONDED by Mr ELLIS
CARRIED unanimously.

Ms DONNA BENJAMIN highlighted the lack of awareness of the Drupal Community. Ms BENJAMIN notes that she is aware that the Drupal Association wants to own the Drupal Events in Australia

Mr HESKETH replies that council have been working with the Drupal Community over the last few months to strengthen the relationship. Acknowledged some miscommunication has occurred with WordPress Foundation and the way that sponsorship occurs. Need to work closely to reduce administrative overhead, and to align goals and interests. Both organisations want to run good open source events.

Ms BENJAMIN asks if there was an expectation that the profits from WordCamp would be returned to the WordPress Foundation

Mr HESKETH replied that No, and the Council would ensure clarity in the future.

Mr Tim (Surname Missed), Lead of WordPress Brisbane, noted that is was their understanding that the financial issues had been resolved, and the WordPress Foundation is grateful for the services that LA provides, and express their gratitude. WordPress community in Australia is willing to work with the Drupal communities and LA to strengthen all communities.

Election of 2016 Council

Mr STEWART SMITH acting as Returning Officer

Mr SMITH notes that the election is run on software he wrote.

Full results https://linux.org.au/membership/index.php?page=view-election&id=22

Election Results:
President: Mr HUGH BLEMINGS.
Vice President: Ms KATHY REID
Secretary: Ms SAE RA GERMAINE
Treasurer: Mr Tony BREEDS
Council Members: Ms CHERIE ELLIS, Ms KATIE McLAUGHLIN, Mr CRAIGE McWHIRTER

Of note: the Election Software recorded an identical amount of votes for Mr McWHIRTER and Mr JAMES ISEPPI. Due to the nature of the program, a ‘coin flip’ of unknown randomisation was used to present either candidate on the page, changing when the page is refreshed.

The Tie Break used was a Physical Coin Flip during the AGM. This was won by Mr McWHIRTER

It was Noted that this Council represents the highest number of women to ever serve on a Council, and are in the majority for the Council

Mr SMITH thanked those who voted, the outgoing council, and the incoming council.

Mr HESKETH gave a warm welcome to the incoming council

Questions from the floor for the new council

Mr HESKETH notes that the votes in the 2015 election numbered 70, whereas this election, 2016, numbered 112. This is a significant increase.

Mr TENNESSEE LEEUWENBURG asked a question regarding active discussion, new names, directions and strategies

Mr BLEMINGS replied that this was something we need to engage with the council and the broader community.

Address from the Incoming President

Mr BLEMINGS noted he was grateful to serve the community in his new position.

Mr BLEMINGS thanked Mr SMITH as the returning officer

Mr BLEMINGS noted the issue of addressing the membership database, with tooling being but one of the interesting challenges ahead.

Mr BLEMINGS noted the expectation as the council to rely on the community

Mr BLEMINGS opened the floor to further questions

Mr RUSSELL COKER noted a LUV free BBQ

Ms CHERIE ELLIS noted communications with NZOpen Source will be improved

MR JOSH HESKETH officially closing the meeting at 1916 hours

Appendix A: President’s Report
Executive summary

Linux Australia continues to be the peak body for Open Source communities in Australia with a strong year. 2015 saw seven open source conferences run within Australia and New Zealand by volunteers under the auspices of LA. This sustained strength in local events is a testament to the dedication and hard work of our collective and expanding community.

During the year the organisation had to deal with an unfortunate breach of their servers. Thankfully the damage was limited and no personal data is believed to be compromised[0]. Full details were released to the members as soon as it was practical and the overall handling and disclosure of the incident was widely praised. A second potential leak of information later in the year highlighted the need for more volunteer help and efforts in keeping our systems up to date and our data secure[1].

After the financial loss from the previous year, the organisation has managed to return a healthy profit and strengthen its overall position allowing itself to be self insuring against conference losses. This is thanks to the hard work of all the events and volunteers throughout the year.

While a 2016 budget is still being drafted it is the hope of the outgoing council that some of the extra funds will be put into the grants and sponsorship account allowing the organisation to create stronger roots in allied organisations such as the Software Freedom Conservancy and the Electronics Frontiers Australia.

The organisation is at a bit of a crossroads while it looks towards the future. I believe protecting our values[2] in an online-first world will become increasingly important. Software as a service poses significant challenges to open source, open data and privacy. I hope to spend a bit of time thinking about ways in which we can address some of these challenges both as Linux Australia and as an open community.

Kathy Reid kicked off a great inflection point on Linux Australia’s strategic direction, proposing some challenges, options and solutions[3]. Anthony Towns also weighed in with some very pragmatic thoughts that were well received by the members[4]. These discussions are ongoing and anybody interested in weighing in (or even better, volunteering) is encouraged to do so on the linux-aus[5] mailing list (which also contains the relevant archives).

As many are likely aware, I decided early on in the year that this term would be my last. I have been on the council for 6 years now (and involved with LA for even longer) and I think it's time for some fresh blood, so to speak. I can not give enough thanks to all of the members and fellow councilors for their support and hard work during this time. I look forward to welcoming in the new council and wish them all the best.

Events and Conferences

During 2015 there were 7 conferences/events ran as part of Linux Australia.

LCA2015
DrupalSouth 2015
PyConAU 2015
OSDC 2015
GovHack 2015
JoomlaDay Brisbane 2015
WordCamp Brisbane 2015

The upcoming events currently being organised as part of Linux Australia:
LCA2016
PyCon AU 2016
WordCamp Sunshine Coast 2016
DrupalSouth 2016
DrupalGov 2016
LCA2017
LCA2018

Reports from the various conferences and their activities can be found at http://linux.org.au/sub-committees or their individual websites.

A timeline of all of Linux Australia’s events can be found here: http://tinyurl.com/koye3mw.

Grants and Sponsorships

Linux Australia has long had a grants programme[6] open to its members for helping fund items that are in alignment with our values[2]. This year the Council approved 2 requests from members and sponsored 3 initiatives.

Contributions to the Drupal8 Acceler8 fund to the value of $7,500
Grant Request from Andrew Donnellan to fund Russell Keith-Magee as a presenter at CompCon 2015 to the value of $1,200.
GovHack award “Open source bounty” for $2,000
Grant request from Donna Benjamin to the value of $1,000 to support the release party for Drupal 8.
DrupalCamp Silver Sponsorship to the value of $500

Sub-Committees

The current non-conference based sub-committees are:

Admin Team
AV Subcommittee
Mirror Team
Web Team
Sydney Linux Users Group
LOGIN (NewcastleLUG)
TASLUG
Media and Communications Subcommittee

Reports from the various sub-committees and their activities can be found at http://linux.org.au/sub-committees

Subcommittee policy and procedure updates

During 2014 the council spent a considerable amount of time working on a new subcommittee policy to help with oversight and the longevity of Linux Australia’s various events. The policy has proven to be a success and has ensured that our conferences have the appropriate help and responsibility assigned to them.

While the policy has been very effective in the early stages of a new subcommittee (during the formation and early budgeting) adherence to it has tended to dwindle as events get closer to their dates. One challenge is finding effective community members to help sit on the various subcommittees. Another is clearly the larger amount of bureaucracy that the policy adds.

The 2016 council should pay close attention to this to ensure that events do not become complacent. A review of the policy would also be helpful given the extra data after having used it for over a year to make sure the policy is actually practicable and actionable.

Advocacy, outreach and related activities

Through our Twitter account, we highlighted articles of interest to the Australian Linux community and grew our number of followers.

Outreach relies on our members taking doing a lot of the leg work. We would like to encourage those interested to take initiative and reach out to the council for support.

Membership platform

One of our carry-over goals from 2014 we hoped to achieve this year was to update our membership platform (currently memberdb). Unfortunately other priorities and difficulties in infrastructure prevented significant effort being expended on this item.

The current membership platform is frail and in need of updating. We need ways to better manage importing of members from LCA registrations, and better ways of contacting our members who may not be on the mailing lists.

The Council, thanks to the hard work of Kathy Reid, has put together a list of requirements of a membership platform and will be looking for volunteers to help with shifting to a new system.

Additionally the Council has considered ways to keep the membership list relevant with only active participants. This is a continued discussion that is dependent on a new system to improve communication before any action can be taken.

Challenges

Linux Australia has a lot of challenges ahead of itself for the coming few years.

I would like to see the community thinking about some bigger questions. The organisation has been successful in recent years in running events but less so in lobbying to the government or advocating for policy changes etc.

Linux and open source are generally well received technologies and don’t require advocating for in the same way that they may have been 10-15 years ago. This raises a question of how do we stay relevant as Linux Australia. In fact, it is pretty obvious that we aren’t relevant as "Linux" Australia since we’re much more about being an open source organisation.

A name change for our organisation has been discussed many times before, but I believe it to still be an important discussion. However, extending even further from that are more fundamental questions to the organisation. For example, with open source being so mainstream, what does that mean for us? Or what does the popularity of mobile and web platforms mean for open source? Are there opportunities or a need for advocacy in those areas? How do we extend our ideals to open web, open data, open government, open hardware and open culture? How do we ensure that our values[2] are upheld in our industries?

I would like to encourage and challenge our membership to be discussing these types of issues in a large picture sense and to be giving thought as to how we might be able to address some of them. Clearly these types of questions are very difficult to tackle purely at a Council level - especially when they are concerned with the administration and ongoing running of the organisation - so it is imperative that the community attempts to gain a consolidated voice in these areas.

A lot of these challenges are reflected in the 2013 membership survey[7] where our brand and purpose was often mis-identified by members not understanding what we do. Addressing these systemic questions will help guide the direction of the organisation and also lead towards addressing issues such as our poor communication to membership.

Closing comments

It has been an honour to be trusted by the community to lead this organisation for such a long time. While I haven't achieved as much as I had planned, it has been a privilege to be involved and to do what I could. I hope that I have been able to improve and continue the organisation's success during this time. Thank you all for this opportunity.

While I have left a large number of proposed, and deliberately unanswered, questions in this report, I hope our members are not discouraged. I believe that we’ve had a very successful year and from an everyday running standpoint we continue to be functional and productive.

However I also believe we will find ourselves at a crossroads where, without these questions addressed, over the next year or two we will fail to keep relevant and we risk becoming complacent and existing purely to do no more than running conferences.

Perhaps that isn’t a bad thing, but it really comes down to our community and members. The Council is not here to drive the organisation but to merely enable its members. As such the direction and outcomes of the organisation will be defined by what we can do collectively, and not by what the Council tries to do.

Of course with the emphasis on the members I can not state highly enough just how much work volunteers put into the organisation. I wish I could thank them all, but I don’t think it is possible. Needless to say it is through the continued hard work of these individuals that Linux Australia continues to operate, and as such, I wish to say thank you to everybody who has been involved.

Similarly with myself not being on the 2016 council, that doesn't mean I will be disappearing altogether. I intend to help the new council on these challenges in any way I can. I also want to make sure that I'm available to consult and offer advice where possible should the new council wish to reach out.

Thank you all for a wonderful term. I look forward to watching this organisation continue to grow to its full potential.

Warm Regards,
Joshua Hesketh
- President, Linux Australia
January, 2016

[0] http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/announce/2015-April/000202.html
[1] http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/announce/2015-November/000213.html
[2] http://linux.org.au/values
[3] http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/linux-aus/2016-January/022356.html
[4] http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/linux-aus/2016-January/022419.html
[5] http://lists.linux.org.au/mailman/listinfo/linux-aus
[6] http://linux.org.au/projects/grants
[7] https://linux.org.au/news/news/linux-australia-member-survey-2013

Appendix B: Treasurer’s Report
http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/announce/2016-February/000220.html

Appendix C: Secretary’s Report
http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/linux-aus/attachments/20160129/cbf20cd4/attachment-0001.pdf

Appendix D: Auditor’s Report
http://lists.linux.org.au/pipermail/announce/attachments/20160201/1820f1ac/attachment-0005.pdf

Appendix E: Record of Attendance

Andrew Donnellan
Andrew McDonnell
Andrew Pollock
Andrew Sands
Andrew Spiers
Andrew Tridgell
Andrew Van Slageren
Angus Cameron
Anthony Towns
Benjamin Ball
Brendan O'dea
Brett James
Brian May
Cameron Tudball
Cherie Ellis
Christopher Neugebauer
Clinton Roy
Craige McWhirter
David Bell
David Tulloh
Dion Hulse
Donna Benjamin
Eloise Macdonald-Meyer
Jack Burton
James Iseppi
James Polley
Jamie Wilkinson
Jared Ring
Jessica Smith
Joel Addison
Joel Shea
John Dalton
John Kristensen
Jonathan Woithe
Jono Bacon
Josh Stewart
Joshua Hesketh
Julian DeMarchi
Julien Goodwin
Kathy Reid
Katie McLaughlin
Leon Wright
Les Kitchen
Lin Nah
Luke Hovington
Michael Cordover
Marco Ostini
Mark Atwood
Mark Ellem
Mark Purcell
Mark Walkom
Matt Cengia
Matthew Franklin
Matthew Oliver
Michael Carden
Michael Ellery
Mike Abrahall
Miles Goodhew
Neill Cox
Paul Del
Paul Fenwick
Paul Foxworthy
Paul Wayper
Peter Chubb
Richard Lemon
Rob Bolin
Russell Coker
Russell Stuart
Ryan Sickle
Ryan Stuart
Sachi King
Stephen Walsh
Steven Ellis
Steven Hanley
Stewart Smith
Tim Ansell
Tim Serong

Categories: thinktime

Glen Turner: Blog moving to Dreamwidth

Planet Linux Australia - Fri 06th Jan 2017 13:01

Getting less and less happy with LiveJournal as a blogging platform: limited input formats, poor presentation, etc. But running your own blogging platform is a nightmare too, as so many of them are written in PHP.

Although it's not really a solution, this blog is moving to https://gdt.dreamwidth.org/.

Categories: thinktime

Glen Turner: Blog moving to Dreamwidth

Planet Linux Australia - Fri 06th Jan 2017 13:01

Getting less and less happy with LiveJournal as a blogging platform: limited input formats, poor presentation, etc. But running your own blogging platform is a nightmare too, as so many of them are written in PHP.

Although it's not really a solution, this blog is moving to https://gdt.dreamwidth.org/.

Categories: thinktime

Gabriel Noronha: Charging point connectors & socket outlets.

Planet Linux Australia - Thu 05th Jan 2017 23:01

Mainly for my own reference.

The New Zealand Transport Agency explanation of charging sockets and plugs.

This is pretty comprehensive and is easily applicable to Australia we have some more choice of vehicles which are not listed mainly in the hybrids but have more strict rules for imports, so no 2nd hand Japanese LEAFs here.

Their recommendation of type 2 sockets for Public AC charging, and CHADeMO and Type 2 CCS for Public DC charging is also something I agree with.

New Zealand like Australia had started to roll out Type 1 CCS but it looks like they’ll be changing all the stations to Type 2 CCS, to align with the European charging standard. Which makes more technical sense as our power girds are similar voltage and frequency.

Personally I hope Australia move to Type 2 CCS like NZ has, but at the moment all the power is in the vehicle manufacture hands, and they benefit form Type 1 CCS as Australia would become the only country in the world to have cars that are right hand drive and Type 1 CCS. Stopping any sort of importation of 2nd hand electric cars even if the rules are relaxed.

Categories: thinktime

Gabriel Noronha: Charging point connectors & socket outlets.

Planet Linux Australia - Thu 05th Jan 2017 23:01

Mainly for my own reference.

The New Zealand Transport Agency explanation of charging sockets and plugs.

This is pretty comprehensive and is easily applicable to Australia we have some more choice of vehicles which are not listed mainly in the hybrids but have more strict rules for imports, so no 2nd hand Japanese LEAFs here.

Their recommendation of type 2 sockets for Public AC charging, and CHADeMO and Type 2 CCS for Public DC charging is also something I agree with.

New Zealand like Australia had started to roll out Type 1 CCS but it looks like they’ll be changing all the stations to Type 2 CCS, to align with the European charging standard. Which makes more technical sense as our power girds are similar voltage and frequency.

Personally I hope Australia move to Type 2 CCS like NZ has, but at the moment all the power is in the vehicle manufacture hands, and they benefit form Type 1 CCS as Australia would become the only country in the world to have cars that are right hand drive and Type 1 CCS. Stopping any sort of importation of 2nd hand electric cars even if the rules are relaxed.

Categories: thinktime

Binh Nguyen: Explaining Prophets 2, What is Liberal Democracy?, and More

Planet Linux Australia - Thu 05th Jan 2017 10:01
Obvious continuation of last post, http://dtbnguyen.blogspot.com/2016/12/explaining-prophets-fake-news-and-more_26.html - suspect that some scientists may have experienced prophetic visions (including Einstein, Newton, Galileo, Da Vinci, Edison, etc...) but didn't talk about them publicly)? Clear that there is almost a 'code' among prophets and genuinely religious people. They seem to know one
Categories: thinktime

Binh Nguyen: Explaining Prophets 2, What is Liberal Democracy?, and More

Planet Linux Australia - Thu 05th Jan 2017 10:01
Obvious continuation of last post, http://dtbnguyen.blogspot.com/2016/12/explaining-prophets-fake-news-and-more_26.html - suspect that some scientists may have experienced prophetic visions (including Einstein, Newton, Galileo, Da Vinci, Edison, etc...) but didn't talk about them publicly)? Clear that there is almost a 'code' among prophets and genuinely religious people. They seem to know one
Categories: thinktime

The Imbalance of Culture Fit

a list apart - Wed 04th Jan 2017 02:01

When I started Bearded back in 2008, I’d never run a business before. This lack of experience meant I didn’t know how to do many of the things I’d ultimately have to do as a business owner. One of the things I didn’t know how to do yet? Hiring.

When it came time to start hiring employees, I thought a lot about what the company needed to advance, what skills it was lacking. I asked friends for advice, and introductions to people they knew and trusted who fit the bill. And I asked myself what felt like a natural question: would I want to hang out with this person all day? Because clearly, I would have to.

The trouble with this question is that I like hanging out with people I can talk to easily. One way to make that happen is to hang out with people who know and like the same books, music, movies, and things that I do; people with similar life experiences. It may not surprise you to learn that people who have experienced and enjoy all the same things I do tend to look a whole lot like me.

The dreaded culture fit

This, my friends, is the sneaky, unintentional danger of “culture fit.” And the only way out I’ve found is to recognize it for what it is–an unhelpful bias–and to consciously correct for it.

Besides being discriminatory by unfairly overvaluing people like yourself, hiring for culture fit has at least one other major detriment: it limits perspective.

At Bearded, our main focus is problem solving. Whether those are user experience problems, project management problems, user interface problems, or development problems–that’s what we do every day.

I’ve found that we arrive at better solutions faster when we collaborate during problem solving. Having two or more people hashing out an issue, suggesting new approaches, spotting flaws in each other’s ideas, or catching things another person missed–this is the heart of good collaboration. And it’s not just about having more than one person, it’s about having different perspectives.

Perspective as a skill

A simple shortcut to finding two people who look at the world differently is to find two people with varied life experience–different genders, races, religions, sexual orientations, economic backgrounds, or abilities… these factors all affect how we see and experience the world. This means that different perspectives–different cultures–are an asset. Varied perspective can be viewed, then, as a skill. It’s something you can consciously hire for, in addition to more traditional skills and experience. Having diverse teams better reflects our humanity, and it helps us do better work.

This isn’t just my experience, either.

According to research conducted by Sheen S. Levine and David Stark, groups that included diverse company produced answers to analytical questions that were 58 percent more accurate.

When surrounded by people “like ourselves,” we are easily influenced, more likely to fall for wrong ideas. Diversity prompts better, critical thinking. It contributes to error detection. It keeps us from drifting toward miscalculation.

Smarter groups and better problem-solving sounds good to me. And so does increased innovation. In her article for Scientific American, Katherine W. Phillips draws on decades of research to arrive at some exciting conclusions.

Diversity enhances creativity. It encourages the search for novel information and perspectives, leading to better decision making and problem solving. Diversity can improve the bottom line of companies and lead to unfettered discoveries and breakthrough innovations. Even simply being exposed to diversity can change the way you think.

Phillips isn’t alone in linking diversity to profit. A Morgan Stanley analysis released in May 2016 showed that gender-diverse companies delivered slightly better returns with lower volatility than their more homogenous peers.

Seems like we’d be crazy not to be thinking about building more diverse teams, doesn’t it?

People make the culture

I recently spoke at Web Directions 2016 in Sydney, and was lucky enough to listen to a talk on gender in the tech industry by Aubrey Blanche from Atlassian. Aubrey made a point of how Atlassian has shifted its perspective from finding people who fit their culture, to having a culture defined by its people.

When hiring, this means tossing out the whole “do I want to hang out with them?” question. Instead, I’ve tried to replace that with more specific, more culture-agnostic questions:

  • Are they kind and empathetic?
  • Do they care about their work?
  • Do they have good communication skills?
  • Do they have good self-management skills?

If the answer to each of these questions is yes, then it’s very likely I will want to hang out with them all day, regardless of which movies they like.

As Aubrey points out, we can then focus on values, and leave culture alone. Our values might be that we treat each other well, that we do great work that we care about, and that we are largely independent but communicate well when it’s time to collaborate. Then we can also include this new question:

  • Do they bring a valuable new perspective?

Hiring based on these values will naturally build a culture that is more comfortable with diversity, because the benefits of diversity become more clear in our daily experiences.

Encouragement and change

Now you don’t need me to tell you no one’s perfect. But when it comes to emotional, high-stakes topics like this, you can see people getting caught in the crosshairs of reproach–and that’s scary to watch. Sometimes it can feel as if we’re all one questionable tweet or ill-considered joke away from public humiliation.

That in mind, let me tell you about a time when I was an idiot.

For context, you should know that I’m a white, heterosexual, cisgender male who grew up in a stable, upper-middle-class environment, and now runs his own business. I pretty much tick all the privilege checkboxes.

Last year at a design conference, I was chatting with industry friends. At some point I brought up a meme that I thought was funny, until one of my friends pointed out that it was sexist. And he was right.

Oh crap, I thought: I’m that guy at the conference, I’m a terrible person. Luckily my friend went easy on me. He understood how I missed the underlying sexist assumptions of the joke, and was happy to bring that to my attention without extending the accusation of sexism to me, personally. He effectively reassured me that I could do something bad, while still being a good person. He gave me the option to admit bad behavior and correct it, without hating myself in the process.

And this, I think, may be the key for people in my very privileged position to change. When problems like this come up, when we make missteps and unveil our biases and ignorance, it’s an opportunity for change. But the opportunity is often much more delicate than any of us would like. Successfully navigating a situation like that requires sensitivity and control from both sides.

For the transgressor, being called out on an issue can feel like being attacked, like an indictment. For those of us who aren’t used to being made uncomfortable, that can be shocking. It can be something we might want to quickly deny, to reject that discomfort. But not all discomfort is, in the end, a bad thing. To give others’ feelings and concerns merit–to validate their different perspective–may require us to sit with our own hurt pride or injured self-image for a bit. Something that may help us through these difficult feelings is to remember that there is a big difference between behaviors and identity. Bad behavior is not immutable. Quite the opposite, bad behavior is often a first step toward good behavior, if we can withstand the discomfort of acknowledging it, and muster the strength to change.

It’s tough getting called out for bad behavior, but things aren’t exactly simple on the other side of the confrontation, either. When we’re offended by someone’s ill-considered words or actions, it can cut to the quick. We might feel required to respond with the full force of our anger or outrage. After all, why should we be expected to police our own tone, when we’re responding to words that weren’t prepared with our feelings in mind? It can be hard, but employing our empathy, our compassion—along with our critique—can be the best way to affect the positive change we want to see.

Right now, you’re doing your best. But we can all do better. Recognizing that we’re doing some bad things doesn’t make us bad people. You have the courage to see what you’ve been doing wrong (unintentionally, I know) and fix that. You can admit to having unfair privileges in the world, without it being your fault for having ended up that way. The world is terribly, horribly unfair. It may very well get worse. But when we have sway, even over a tiny part of it, we have to do our best to balance those scales, and make things a little better. I can do more, and so can you. So let’s see if we can’t get to an even better place in 2017, together.

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Aubrey Blanche and Annette Priest for their thoughtful consideration and feedback on this article. My infinite gratitude goes out, as always, to my editor Rose Weisburd, who helped me find my way even more than usual this time around.

Categories: thinktime

The Imbalance of Culture Fit

a list apart - Wed 04th Jan 2017 02:01

When I started Bearded back in 2008, I’d never run a business before. This lack of experience meant I didn’t know how to do many of the things I’d ultimately have to do as a business owner. One of the things I didn’t know how to do yet? Hiring.

When it came time to start hiring employees, I thought a lot about what the company needed to advance, what skills it was lacking. I asked friends for advice, and introductions to people they knew and trusted who fit the bill. And I asked myself what felt like a natural question: would I want to hang out with this person all day? Because clearly, I would have to.

The trouble with this question is that I like hanging out with people I can talk to easily. One way to make that happen is to hang out with people who know and like the same books, music, movies, and things that I do; people with similar life experiences. It may not surprise you to learn that people who have experienced and enjoy all the same things I do tend to look a whole lot like me.

The dreaded culture fit

This, my friends, is the sneaky, unintentional danger of “culture fit.” And the only way out I’ve found is to recognize it for what it is–an unhelpful bias–and to consciously correct for it.

Besides being discriminatory by unfairly overvaluing people like yourself, hiring for culture fit has at least one other major detriment: it limits perspective.

At Bearded, our main focus is problem solving. Whether those are user experience problems, project management problems, user interface problems, or development problems–that’s what we do every day.

I’ve found that we arrive at better solutions faster when we collaborate during problem solving. Having two or more people hashing out an issue, suggesting new approaches, spotting flaws in each other’s ideas, or catching things another person missed–this is the heart of good collaboration. And it’s not just about having more than one person, it’s about having different perspectives.

Perspective as a skill

A simple shortcut to finding two people who look at the world differently is to find two people with varied life experience–different genders, races, religions, sexual orientations, economic backgrounds, or abilities… these factors all affect how we see and experience the world. This means that different perspectives–different cultures–are an asset. Varied perspective can be viewed, then, as a skill. It’s something you can consciously hire for, in addition to more traditional skills and experience. Having diverse teams better reflects our humanity, and it helps us do better work.

This isn’t just my experience, either.

According to research conducted by Sheen S. Levine and David Stark, groups that included diverse company produced answers to analytical questions that were 58 percent more accurate.

When surrounded by people “like ourselves,” we are easily influenced, more likely to fall for wrong ideas. Diversity prompts better, critical thinking. It contributes to error detection. It keeps us from drifting toward miscalculation.

Smarter groups and better problem-solving sounds good to me. And so does increased innovation. In her article for Scientific American, Katherine W. Phillips draws on decades of research to arrive at some exciting conclusions.

Diversity enhances creativity. It encourages the search for novel information and perspectives, leading to better decision making and problem solving. Diversity can improve the bottom line of companies and lead to unfettered discoveries and breakthrough innovations. Even simply being exposed to diversity can change the way you think.

Phillips isn’t alone in linking diversity to profit. A Morgan Stanley analysis released in May 2016 showed that gender-diverse companies delivered slightly better returns with lower volatility than their more homogenous peers.

Seems like we’d be crazy not to be thinking about building more diverse teams, doesn’t it?

People make the culture

I recently spoke at Web Directions 2016 in Sydney, and was lucky enough to listen to a talk on gender in the tech industry by Aubrey Blanche from Atlassian. Aubrey made a point of how Atlassian has shifted its perspective from finding people who fit their culture, to having a culture defined by its people.

When hiring, this means tossing out the whole “do I want to hang out with them?” question. Instead, I’ve tried to replace that with more specific, more culture-agnostic questions:

  • Are they kind and empathetic?
  • Do they care about their work?
  • Do they have good communication skills?
  • Do they have good self-management skills?

If the answer to each of these questions is yes, then it’s very likely I will want to hang out with them all day, regardless of which movies they like.

As Aubrey points out, we can then focus on values, and leave culture alone. Our values might be that we treat each other well, that we do great work that we care about, and that we are largely independent but communicate well when it’s time to collaborate. Then we can also include this new question:

  • Do they bring a valuable new perspective?

Hiring based on these values will naturally build a culture that is more comfortable with diversity, because the benefits of diversity become more clear in our daily experiences.

Encouragement and change

Now you don’t need me to tell you no one’s perfect. But when it comes to emotional, high-stakes topics like this, you can see people getting caught in the crosshairs of reproach–and that’s scary to watch. Sometimes it can feel as if we’re all one questionable tweet or ill-considered joke away from public humiliation.

That in mind, let me tell you about a time when I was an idiot.

For context, you should know that I’m a white, heterosexual, cisgender male who grew up in a stable, upper-middle-class environment, and now runs his own business. I pretty much tick all the privilege checkboxes.

Last year at a design conference, I was chatting with industry friends. At some point I brought up a meme that I thought was funny, until one of my friends pointed out that it was sexist. And he was right.

Oh crap, I thought: I’m that guy at the conference, I’m a terrible person. Luckily my friend went easy on me. He understood how I missed the underlying sexist assumptions of the joke, and was happy to bring that to my attention without extending the accusation of sexism to me, personally. He effectively reassured me that I could do something bad, while still being a good person. He gave me the option to admit bad behavior and correct it, without hating myself in the process.

And this, I think, may be the key for people in my very privileged position to change. When problems like this come up, when we make missteps and unveil our biases and ignorance, it’s an opportunity for change. But the opportunity is often much more delicate than any of us would like. Successfully navigating a situation like that requires sensitivity and control from both sides.

For the transgressor, being called out on an issue can feel like being attacked, like an indictment. For those of us who aren’t used to being made uncomfortable, that can be shocking. It can be something we might want to quickly deny, to reject that discomfort. But not all discomfort is, in the end, a bad thing. To give others’ feelings and concerns merit–to validate their different perspective–may require us to sit with our own hurt pride or injured self-image for a bit. Something that may help us through these difficult feelings is to remember that there is a big difference between behaviors and identity. Bad behavior is not immutable. Quite the opposite, bad behavior is often a first step toward good behavior, if we can withstand the discomfort of acknowledging it, and muster the strength to change.

It’s tough getting called out for bad behavior, but things aren’t exactly simple on the other side of the confrontation, either. When we’re offended by someone’s ill-considered words or actions, it can cut to the quick. We might feel required to respond with the full force of our anger or outrage. After all, why should we be expected to police our own tone, when we’re responding to words that weren’t prepared with our feelings in mind? It can be hard, but employing our empathy, our compassion—along with our critique—can be the best way to affect the positive change we want to see.

Right now, you’re doing your best. But we can all do better. Recognizing that we’re doing some bad things doesn’t make us bad people. You have the courage to see what you’ve been doing wrong (unintentionally, I know) and fix that. You can admit to having unfair privileges in the world, without it being your fault for having ended up that way. The world is terribly, horribly unfair. It may very well get worse. But when we have sway, even over a tiny part of it, we have to do our best to balance those scales, and make things a little better. I can do more, and so can you. So let’s see if we can’t get to an even better place in 2017, together.

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Aubrey Blanche and Annette Priest for their thoughtful consideration and feedback on this article. My infinite gratitude goes out, as always, to my editor Rose Weisburd, who helped me find my way even more than usual this time around.

Categories: thinktime

The Imbalance of Culture Fit

a list apart - Wed 04th Jan 2017 02:01

When I started Bearded back in 2008, I’d never run a business before. This lack of experience meant I didn’t know how to do many of the things I’d ultimately have to do as a business owner. One of the things I didn’t know how to do yet? Hiring.

When it came time to start hiring employees, I thought a lot about what the company needed to advance, what skills it was lacking. I asked friends for advice, and introductions to people they knew and trusted who fit the bill. And I asked myself what felt like a natural question: would I want to hang out with this person all day? Because clearly, I would have to.

The trouble with this question is that I like hanging out with people I can talk to easily. One way to make that happen is to hang out with people who know and like the same books, music, movies, and things that I do; people with similar life experiences. It may not surprise you to learn that people who have experienced and enjoy all the same things I do tend to look a whole lot like me.

The dreaded culture fit

This, my friends, is the sneaky, unintentional danger of “culture fit.” And the only way out I’ve found is to recognize it for what it is–an unhelpful bias–and to consciously correct for it.

Besides being discriminatory by unfairly overvaluing people like yourself, hiring for culture fit has at least one other major detriment: it limits perspective.

At Bearded, our main focus is problem solving. Whether those are user experience problems, project management problems, user interface problems, or development problems–that’s what we do every day.

I’ve found that we arrive at better solutions faster when we collaborate during problem solving. Having two or more people hashing out an issue, suggesting new approaches, spotting flaws in each other’s ideas, or catching things another person missed–this is the heart of good collaboration. And it’s not just about having more than one person, it’s about having different perspectives.

Perspective as a skill

A simple shortcut to finding two people who look at the world differently is to find two people with varied life experience–different genders, races, religions, sexual orientations, economic backgrounds, or abilities… these factors all affect how we see and experience the world. This means that different perspectives–different cultures–are an asset. Varied perspective can be viewed, then, as a skill. It’s something you can consciously hire for, in addition to more traditional skills and experience. Having diverse teams better reflects our humanity, and it helps us do better work.

This isn’t just my experience, either.

According to research conducted by Sheen S. Levine and David Stark, groups that included diverse company produced answers to analytical questions that were 58 percent more accurate.

When surrounded by people “like ourselves,” we are easily influenced, more likely to fall for wrong ideas. Diversity prompts better, critical thinking. It contributes to error detection. It keeps us from drifting toward miscalculation.

Smarter groups and better problem-solving sounds good to me. And so does increased innovation. In her article for Scientific American, Katherine W. Phillips draws on decades of research to arrive at some exciting conclusions.

Diversity enhances creativity. It encourages the search for novel information and perspectives, leading to better decision making and problem solving. Diversity can improve the bottom line of companies and lead to unfettered discoveries and breakthrough innovations. Even simply being exposed to diversity can change the way you think.

Phillips isn’t alone in linking diversity to profit. A Morgan Stanley analysis released in May 2016 showed that gender-diverse companies delivered slightly better returns with lower volatility than their more homogenous peers.

Seems like we’d be crazy not to be thinking about building more diverse teams, doesn’t it?

People make the culture

I recently spoke at Web Directions 2016 in Sydney, and was lucky enough to listen to a talk on gender in the tech industry by Aubrey Blanche from Atlassian. Aubrey made a point of how Atlassian has shifted its perspective from finding people who fit their culture, to having a culture defined by its people.

When hiring, this means tossing out the whole “do I want to hang out with them?” question. Instead, I’ve tried to replace that with more specific, more culture-agnostic questions:

  • Are they kind and empathetic?
  • Do they care about their work?
  • Do they have good communication skills?
  • Do they have good self-management skills?

If the answer to each of these questions is yes, then it’s very likely I will want to hang out with them all day, regardless of which movies they like.

As Aubrey points out, we can then focus on values, and leave culture alone. Our values might be that we treat each other well, that we do great work that we care about, and that we are largely independent but communicate well when it’s time to collaborate. Then we can also include this new question:

  • Do they bring a valuable new perspective?

Hiring based on these values will naturally build a culture that is more comfortable with diversity, because the benefits of diversity become more clear in our daily experiences.

Encouragement and change

Now you don’t need me to tell you no one’s perfect. But when it comes to emotional, high-stakes topics like this, you can see people getting caught in the crosshairs of reproach–and that’s scary to watch. Sometimes it can feel as if we’re all one questionable tweet or ill-considered joke away from public humiliation.

That in mind, let me tell you about a time when I was an idiot.

For context, you should know that I’m a white, heterosexual, cisgender male who grew up in a stable, upper-middle-class environment, and now runs his own business. I pretty much tick all the privilege checkboxes.

Last year at a design conference, I was chatting with industry friends. At some point I brought up a meme that I thought was funny, until one of my friends pointed out that it was sexist. And he was right.

Oh crap, I thought: I’m that guy at the conference, I’m a terrible person. Luckily my friend went easy on me. He understood how I missed the underlying sexist assumptions of the joke, and was happy to bring that to my attention without extending the accusation of sexism to me, personally. He effectively reassured me that I could do something bad, while still being a good person. He gave me the option to admit bad behavior and correct it, without hating myself in the process.

And this, I think, may be the key for people in my very privileged position to change. When problems like this come up, when we make missteps and unveil our biases and ignorance, it’s an opportunity for change. But the opportunity is often much more delicate than any of us would like. Successfully navigating a situation like that requires sensitivity and control from both sides.

For the transgressor, being called out on an issue can feel like being attacked, like an indictment. For those of us who aren’t used to being made uncomfortable, that can be shocking. It can be something we might want to quickly deny, to reject that discomfort. But not all discomfort is, in the end, a bad thing. To give others’ feelings and concerns merit–to validate their different perspective–may require us to sit with our own hurt pride or injured self-image for a bit. Something that may help us through these difficult feelings is to remember that there is a big difference between behaviors and identity. Bad behavior is not immutable. Quite the opposite, bad behavior is often a first step toward good behavior, if we can withstand the discomfort of acknowledging it, and muster the strength to change.

It’s tough getting called out for bad behavior, but things aren’t exactly simple on the other side of the confrontation, either. When we’re offended by someone’s ill-considered words or actions, it can cut to the quick. We might feel required to respond with the full force of our anger or outrage. After all, why should we be expected to police our own tone, when we’re responding to words that weren’t prepared with our feelings in mind? It can be hard, but employing our empathy, our compassion—along with our critique—can be the best way to affect the positive change we want to see.

Right now, you’re doing your best. But we can all do better. Recognizing that we’re doing some bad things doesn’t make us bad people. You have the courage to see what you’ve been doing wrong (unintentionally, I know) and fix that. You can admit to having unfair privileges in the world, without it being your fault for having ended up that way. The world is terribly, horribly unfair. It may very well get worse. But when we have sway, even over a tiny part of it, we have to do our best to balance those scales, and make things a little better. I can do more, and so can you. So let’s see if we can’t get to an even better place in 2017, together.

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Aubrey Blanche and Annette Priest for their thoughtful consideration and feedback on this article. My infinite gratitude goes out, as always, to my editor Rose Weisburd, who helped me find my way even more than usual this time around.

Categories: thinktime

Peter Lieverdink: Southern Exposure

Planet Linux Australia - Mon 02nd Jan 2017 17:01

From time to time you see photos pop up on the internet that show off bits of the northern sky. A good example is a montage of the Moon and Andromeda that show what size Andromeda would be in the sky, if only it were actuallty visible to the naked eye.

Bad Astronomy did a blog post on that one and explained that though the image is fake, the relative sizes are pretty much correct.

However, that's not a lot of use to us poor people in the southern hemisphere that can't even see Andromeda at the best of times. What even are these northerners talking about?

During public viewings at Mount Burnett Observatory, people often want to see a galaxy and ask to see Andromeda. However, we always need to disappoint them, as at our latitude of 37.5 degrees south Andromeda barely rises high enough to clear the trees. And even if it does clear the trees, it's so low in the sky that you're looking at it through light pollution and dusty atmosphere.

So I thought I'd make a montage of the Moon and our visible galaxies (the Magallanic Clouds) to show of their relative sizes. Hopefully that will make people eventually ask to see these, as they are easily bright enough to see from a dark spot with the naked eye when the moon isn't up!

I took the Moon from the original photo by Stephen Rahn and pasted it onto (approximately) the south celestial pole on a long exposure photo I took of the southern sky over the 2016/2017 New Years weekend.

The visible part Large Magellanic Cloud in this photo is about 2.5 degrees on the short axis, so that makes it about 5 times wider than the full moon, which is about half a degree. If anything, I estimated the moon to be a little bit too big in this montage.

There are also fainter parts that I couldn't capture in this photo. On the long axis the full LMC is about 10.5 degrees across - 21 times the width of the Moon!

So, the next time you see the original montage with Andromeda do the rounds and wish you could see a large galaxy, all you need to do is go outside on a dark night and look up!

You can find my original southern sky image on Flickr.

Tags: astronomy
Categories: thinktime

Peter Lieverdink: Southern Exposure

Planet Linux Australia - Mon 02nd Jan 2017 17:01

From time to time you see photos pop up on the internet that show off bits of the northern sky. A good example is a montage of the Moon and Andromeda that show what size Andromeda would be in the sky, if only it were actuallty visible to the naked eye.

Bad Astronomy did a blog post on that one and explained that though the image is fake, the relative sizes are pretty much correct.

However, that's not a lot of use to us poor people in the southern hemisphere that can't even see Andromeda at the best of times. What even are these northerners talking about?

During public viewings at Mount Burnett Observatory, people often want to see a galaxy and ask to see Andromeda. However, we always need to disappoint them, as at our latitude of 37.5 degrees south Andromeda barely rises high enough to clear the trees. And even if it does clear the trees, it's so low in the sky that you're looking at it through light pollution and dusty atmosphere.

So I thought I'd make a montage of the Moon and our visible galaxies (the Magallanic Clouds) to show of their relative sizes. Hopefully that will make people eventually ask to see these, as they are easily bright enough to see from a dark spot with the naked eye when the moon isn't up!

I took the Moon from the original photo by Stephen Rahn and pasted it onto (approximately) the south celestial pole on a long exposure photo I took of the southern sky over the 2016/2017 New Years weekend.

The visible part Large Magellanic Cloud in this photo is about 2.5 degrees on the short axis, so that makes it about 5 times wider than the full moon, which is about half a degree. If anything, I estimated the moon to be a little bit too big in this montage.

There are also fainter parts that I couldn't capture in this photo. On the long axis the full LMC is about 10.5 degrees across - 21 times the width of the Moon!

So, the next time you see the original montage with Andromeda do the rounds and wish you could see a large galaxy, all you need to do is go outside on a dark night and look up!

You can find my original southern sky image on Flickr.

Tags: astronomy
Categories: thinktime

Ben Martin: Keeping an eye on it

Planet Linux Australia - Mon 02nd Jan 2017 10:01
The CNC enclosure now sports a few cameras so I can keep an eye on things from anywhere. The small "endocam" mounting worked out particularly well. The small bracket was created using 2mm alloy, jigsawed, flapped, drilled and mounted fairly quick. These copper coated saddle clamps also add a look good factor to the whole build.



A huge plus side is that I now also have a good base to bolt the mist unit onto. It is tempting to redesign the camera mounting bracket in Fusion and CNC a new one in 6mm alloy but there's no real need for this purpose. Shortest effective path to working solution and all that.

Categories: thinktime

Ben Martin: Keeping an eye on it

Planet Linux Australia - Mon 02nd Jan 2017 10:01
The CNC enclosure now sports a few cameras so I can keep an eye on things from anywhere. The small "endocam" mounting worked out particularly well. The small bracket was created using 2mm alloy, jigsawed, flapped, drilled and mounted fairly quick. These copper coated saddle clamps also add a look good factor to the whole build.



A huge plus side is that I now also have a good base to bolt the mist unit onto. It is tempting to redesign the camera mounting bracket in Fusion and CNC a new one in 6mm alloy but there's no real need for this purpose. Shortest effective path to working solution and all that.

Categories: thinktime

Chris Neugebauer: My 2016 Highlights

Planet Linux Australia - Sun 01st Jan 2017 19:01

2016 was, undeniably, a length of time containing 366 days and a leap second.

For me, there were a bunch of highlights that it would be amiss to let pass without recording on this blog, so here goes:

  • At linux.conf.au 2016 in Geelong in February, I announced linux.conf.au 2017 in Hobart. Over the last year, the conference team and I ran a wildly successful CFP, found 4 amazing keynotes, and lined up what looks like it should be an excellent conference. The only* thing left to do is actually run the thing.
  • At PyCon in Montréal in 2014, I ran a BoF session for regional PyCon organisers. Two people from the Dominican Republic showed up and asked for our help in starting a PyCon in the Caribbean. In February 2016, I got to go to that conference, and it was incredible!
  • On that note, I got to continue building on a deeply wonderful relationship with the amazing Josh Simmons that we started in 2015. Over the course of 2016, we got to spend time with each other on no fewer than 6 occasions, both in North America, and here in Australia. We met (and got along quite well with) each others’ friends and families. We spent time living together, and have made big steps towards living together permanently this year. Frankly, I could do a whole post on this and I’m not sure why I haven’t.
  • On a slightly related note, I spent 92,000-odd miles in the air this year. Much of that was spent ducking over to the US to spend time with Josh; some of the rest was with Josh, and some of it was alone. I got to see some wonderful places I’ve never seen before, like the Grand Canyon and Hoover Dam, an actual northern hemisphere winter with snow and everything, and driving up the Californian coast from Los Angeles.
  • … and one night in May, on the Steel Bridge in Portland, Josh and I decided that we should get married.

So those are some of the highlights of my year. It’s been entirely not bad, in the grand scheme of things. Hooray!

Categories: thinktime

Chris Neugebauer: My 2016 Highlights

Planet Linux Australia - Sun 01st Jan 2017 19:01

2016 was, undeniably, a length of time containing 366 days and a leap second.

For me, there were a bunch of highlights that it would be amiss to let pass without recording on this blog, so here goes:

  • At linux.conf.au 2016 in Geelong in February, I announced linux.conf.au 2017 in Hobart. Over the last year, the conference team and I ran a wildly successful CFP, found 4 amazing keynotes, and lined up what looks like it should be an excellent conference. The only* thing left to do is actually run the thing.
  • At PyCon in Montréal in 2014, I ran a BoF session for regional PyCon organisers. Two people from the Dominican Republic showed up and asked for our help in starting a PyCon in the Caribbean. In February 2016, I got to go to that conference, and it was incredible!
  • On that note, I got to continue building on a deeply wonderful relationship with the amazing Josh Simmons that we started in 2015. Over the course of 2016, we got to spend time with each other on no fewer than 6 occasions, both in North America, and here in Australia. We met (and got along quite well with) each others’ friends and families. We spent time living together, and have made big steps towards living together permanently this year. Frankly, I could do a whole post on this and I’m not sure why I haven’t.
  • On a slightly related note, I spent 92,000-odd miles in the air this year. Much of that was spent ducking over to the US to spend time with Josh; some of the rest was with Josh, and some of it was alone. I got to see some wonderful places I’ve never seen before, like the Grand Canyon and Hoover Dam, an actual northern hemisphere winter with snow and everything, and driving up the Californian coast from Los Angeles.
  • … and one night in May, on the Steel Bridge in Portland, Josh and I decided that we should get married.

So those are some of the highlights of my year. It’s been entirely not bad, in the grand scheme of things. Hooray!

Categories: thinktime

Simon Lyall: Passengers vs “50 Girls 50”

Planet Linux Australia - Sat 31st Dec 2016 21:12

Spoilers: Minor for Passengers, Major for 50 Girls 50.

In late 2016 the movie passengers came out staring Jennifer Lawrence and Chris Pratt. The movie is set aboard a sleeper spaceship and the plot centers around the two leads characters waking up early. I won’t say more about movie but there is summary of the plot in the wikipedia entry for the movie. You can compare it to the comic below to see the similarities and differences.

When I first saw the trailer it reminded me of a Sci-Fi comic I read years ago, others noticed it was similar and gave a name of the comic as “50 Girls 50” by Al Williamson. I couldn’t find a summary of  short story so I thought I’d write it up here.

50 Girls 50 by Al Williamson – Plot summary

The story is a 6 page comic with one off characters. It is set in the distant future aboard a spaceship making humanity’s first journey to a nearby star. Since the trip will take 100 years the the crew/passengers of 50 women and 50 men (hence the title) will be frozen for the whole journey. However the freezing technology used only works on a person once, if you attempt to refreeze somebody they will die.

The plot of the story is partially told though flashbacks but I’ll tell it is chronological order.

The main character is Sid who before the voyage starts is attracted to one of the other passengers Wendy. Wendy notices his attraction and they get together. After a time Wendy has proposition for him. She suggest that Sid sabotage the Deep-freeze (D-F) units so that  he wakes up early. He can then wake her up and they can wake up the others one at a time and “make them our slaves”

Sid however as his own idea. What he wants to do is just have a series of girlfriends. He’ll set his clock for two years out. Then he will wake up Wendy and live with he for a while, when he gets tired of Wendy he will get rid of her and move to the next girl and so on.

Once the voyage starts things go to Sid’s plan. He thaws out 2 years in but instead of waking up Wendy he decided to thaw out Laura first. He then pretends to Laura that they both accidentally thawed out.

“Almost a year” later he gets tired and Laura, shoots he with a “Paralyzer” gun and stuffs he back in a Freeze-chamber to die.

He then prepares to wake Wendy. First he sets the Ships clock to say they will reach the destination in 3 years to give him enough time to get tired of Wendy. Things don’t go according to plan however when Wendy wakes up:

Not really a happy ending for anyone, although it is not like Sid or Wendy really deserved one.

 

Share

Categories: thinktime

Simon Lyall: Passengers vs “50 Girls 50”

Planet Linux Australia - Sat 31st Dec 2016 21:12

Spoilers: Minor for Passengers, Major for 50 Girls 50.

In late 2016 the movie passengers came out staring Jennifer Lawrence and Chris Pratt. The movie is set aboard a sleeper spaceship and the plot centers around the two leads characters waking up early. I won’t say more about movie but there is summary of the plot in the wikipedia entry for the movie. You can compare it to the comic below to see the similarities and differences.

When I first saw the trailer it reminded me of a Sci-Fi comic I read years ago, others noticed it was similar and gave a name of the comic as “50 Girls 50” by Al Williamson. I couldn’t find a summary of  short story so I thought I’d write it up here.

50 Girls 50 by Al Williamson – Plot summary

The story is a 6 page comic with one off characters. It is set in the distant future aboard a spaceship making humanity’s first journey to a nearby star. Since the trip will take 100 years the the crew/passengers of 50 women and 50 men (hence the title) will be frozen for the whole journey. However the freezing technology used only works on a person once, if you attempt to refreeze somebody they will die.

The plot of the story is partially told though flashbacks but I’ll tell it is chronological order.

The main character is Sid who before the voyage starts is attracted to one of the other passengers Wendy. Wendy notices his attraction and they get together. After a time Wendy has proposition for him. She suggest that Sid sabotage the Deep-freeze (D-F) units so that  he wakes up early. He can then wake her up and they can wake up the others one at a time and “make them our slaves”

Sid however as his own idea. What he wants to do is just have a series of girlfriends. He’ll set his clock for two years out. Then he will wake up Wendy and live with he for a while, when he gets tired of Wendy he will get rid of her and move to the next girl and so on.

Once the voyage starts things go to Sid’s plan. He thaws out 2 years in but instead of waking up Wendy he decided to thaw out Laura first. He then pretends to Laura that they both accidentally thawed out.

“Almost a year” later he gets tired and Laura, shoots he with a “Paralyzer” gun and stuffs he back in a Freeze-chamber to die.

He then prepares to wake Wendy. First he sets the Ships clock to say they will reach the destination in 3 years to give him enough time to get tired of Wendy. Things don’t go according to plan however when Wendy wakes up:

Not really a happy ending for anyone, although it is not like Sid or Wendy really deserved one.

 

Share

Categories: thinktime

Ben Martin: First alloy on the 3040 cnc (with 2.2kw spindle)

Planet Linux Australia - Tue 27th Dec 2016 19:12
There are times when words are not needed. When you see a 3040 or 6040 cnc without any enclosure there is a good chance that the machine doesn't see heavy alloy cutting. It only takes a few videos to see how chips are thrown around when a 24krpm bit touches a block of alloy. As a prelude to any alloy being cut I enclosed the 3040 in a "terrarium". This was itself an interesting build and as usual I overdid the design. The top and bottom box frames are made of 5cm square timber with a fairly solid base panel. The back is just light junk with plywood bolted to tabs on each side so I can replace things as I feel. The door opens beyond 90 degrees to get right out of the way and closes to rest on the base 5cm timber at the front of the enclosure.


For anybody reading this I have one word of advice, any gaps in the first 50cm from the machine base will have chips thrown at them. So make sure that the angles the chips might come from near the spindle have been accounted for with your air venting that allows some cooling into the mix. The sides of this case are more than 80cm in height.

The next modification is a mister to help clear local chips and bring some light amount of cutting fluid into the cut zone. The first runs were just using a light spray of CDT over the cut zone before job start.

The very end of one of the first runs is shown in the below video.



The parts being cut are wheel mount crossover plates to allow an outdoor robot to have larger wheels attached. The wheels want M8 bolts, the motor mount is an actobotics pattern, so an M4 hole was a good fit there. Because it's CNC the part itself was cut with many splines to include material where it could do structural good and exclude it otherwise.

I found it useful to cut templates in MDF to test the fit before a final run. This fed into part 3 which includes mounting holes for all 4 bolts of the hub mount. The alloy version 4 also has rounded ends and is shown attached to the wheel. This will let some cheap $10 wheels which are 12 inch across mount to an actobotics based robot.


I'll have video of the "houndbot" in action using these mounts next time.
Categories: thinktime

Pages

Subscribe to kattekrab aggregator